Looking for a tech savvy legal team:
- Must be comfortable in front of a camera.
- Needs to be street smart.
- Needs to keep ego in check.
- Needs to have attention to detail.
- Must not get trapped into making the same point over and over.
- Must excercise extreme patience – the other side does not have quick reflexes.
- Needs to work with the client’s wife.
- Needs to be careful not to leak confidential without prejudice letters.
- Must have humility – needs to understand that you can always learn from others.
- Must be persistent and dynamic – able to change the strategy at any time.
- Realise the motivation for the action.
- Will be paid well – there is an opportunity to earn royalties.
- Must understand immigration law.
- Must keep up to date with immigration law.
The defendant:
- Will pretend to not understand past, present and future tense.
- Uses rudimentary technology.
- Cannot navigate Google maps.
- Will argue themselves out of an alibi.
- Will use techniques to try to drive up legal costs.
- Will point out errors and feign ignorance.
- Will use confusion as a distraction technique.
- Does not respond to compliments – you will not be able to build rapport or trust.
- Are cunning but not very smart.
- Has difficulty counting – will refer to 2 and 3 solutions interchangeably.
- Genuinely believes that time does not matter.
- Will not quote information in whole or in context.
- Will use every word you say against you.
- Does not have a good command of English. Words such as how and live need to be explained fully.
- Only understand concise and simple language – they often misinterpret what they are told. They do not understand familial relationships such as daughter.
- Will ask for evidence and then critique the evidence when it is given to them. It is difficult to keep them happy.
- Will try to introduce inadmissible evidence such as attendance notes.
- Will try to confuse leave to enter, leave to remain, 5-year route and 10-year route.
- Has a hard time discerning the difference between guidance for Home Office staff and the law.
- Does not always think logically or in sequence.
- Will try to attack client’s wife not realising she is undeterred and does not care.
- Does not understand that threats of defamation are not taken seriously.
- Will only admit to the clients name in their defense. Everything else is denied.
- Does not seem to feel shame – elements of sociopathic behaviour.
