PARTICULARS OF CLAIM – 12 December 2023

​​17. On 8 February 2022 the Home Office rejected the Claimant’s application.”

GARDEN COURT – 11 January 2024

”It is denied that the Home Office rejected the Claimant’s application; in immigration law, rejection is a technical term which means treating an application as invalid. That did not occur here. Rather, the Home Office substantively considered and refused the application.”

OUR COMMENTS

It was rejected therefore the application was invalid.

KENNEDYS LAW – 27 September 2023

”Miss Xxx applied under Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules using form FLR(M), for your Client to be granted leave to remain in the UK as the spouse of a British Citizen, under the COVID-19 concession. Human rights arguments were cited, for the sake of completeness.”

UK MIGRATION LAWYERS COMPLAINT FEEDBACK – 16 June 2022

“It is also your claim that “Miss Xxx was negligent to proceed with an application we clearly did not qualify for”, however, I am of the view that it is entirely evident that there was no negligence whatsoever in Miss Xxx’s conduct of this matter and that your claim is a function of your misunderstanding of the SSHD’s phraseology.”

By admin

2 thought on “TRYING TO BEEF UP THE DEFENCE”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You cannot copy content of this page